This project focused on a crucial part of writing resilient software: handling errors and controlling program flow when things go wrong.
In Python, this means mastering try, except, and custom exception classes — not just to catch bugs, but to design meaningful failure behavior.
Step 1 — Custom Exception Classes
We started by defining custom exceptions that better describe what went wrong:
class MessageError(Exception):
pass
class EncryptionError(MessageError):
pass
class FormatError(MessageError):
pass
This builds a hierarchy of exception types, so you can catch general or specific errors depending on your needs.
Step 2 — Raising Exceptions with Meaning
Instead of vague ValueError or RuntimeError, we raise domain-specific errors:
def encode_message(msg):
if not isinstance(msg, str):
raise FormatError("Message must be a string")
# continue encoding...
These make tracebacks easier to interpret and log files more useful.
Step 3 — Handling Failures Gracefully
We then use try/except blocks to catch specific issues and take appropriate action:
try:
result = encode_message(data)
except FormatError as e:
print("Formatting problem:", e)
except EncryptionError as e:
print("Encryption failed:", e)
This avoids crashing the program on expected failure conditions.
Step 4 — Designing Message Systems
The code in message.py simulates a messaging system where you might:
- Encode/decode messages
- Validate input
- Raise appropriate exceptions if anything goes wrong
This forced us to think about how to communicate errors clearly, both to users and developers.
Takeaways
- Exceptions aren’t just for bugs — they’re for expected failure modes
- Custom exception classes improve clarity and structure
- Good error messages are as important as good code
Next, we’ll explore how exceptions interact with stack traces, and how Python’s call stack behaves during normal and exceptional control flow.